<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>historeo.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://historeo.com/web/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://historeo.com/web</link>
	<description>to discuss, discern, understand . . .</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 03:32:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;War on Women&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1770</link>
		<comments>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1770#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 15:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wtb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[- Sexuality/Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war on women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historeo.com/web/?p=1770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there a &#8220;war on women&#8221;? Democratic Congressman Jim McDermott accuses Republicans of waging a war on women, 8 April 2011 Hardly, if one considers that women exceed men in most if not all quality-of-life indicators &#8212; and the gap continues to widen. Truth is Western civilization tends to indulge women rather than oppress them. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://historeo.com/web/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1770</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Good Christian B*****s&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1768</link>
		<comments>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1768#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 21:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wtb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GCB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good christian bitches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good muslim b*****s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hab 1:12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Habakkuk 1:12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leftism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leftist media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[providence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historeo.com/web/?p=1768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ABC has hit the basement button on cultural decadence with “Good Christian Bitches,” a new comedy series with an epithetic title that promises more of the same in terms of series content. Copyrighted image. Use here in critical commentary is fair use. Any other use may a copyright infringement. And although ABC has since acronymed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://historeo.com/web/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1768</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;Docetic&#8221; View of the Bible</title>
		<link>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1759</link>
		<comments>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1759#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 02:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wtb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catholic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[docetic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[docetism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[god's word]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protestant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scripture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historeo.com/web/?p=1759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Docetism&#8221; (from the Greek word &#8220;dokeo&#8221; meaning &#8220;I seem&#8221;) usually refers to an unorthodox view of Jesus that alleges He was a pure spirit and only &#8220;seemed&#8221; to have a physical body. Orthodoxy of course has long insisted Jesus had two natures, one human and the other divine. The the purpose of this post though [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://historeo.com/web/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1759</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Types of Speech</title>
		<link>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1754</link>
		<comments>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1754#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 20:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wtb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agonizers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aplogetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apologia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catechesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[common faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[declaration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dividing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidentialist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fellowship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gospel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insiders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irenics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[katecheo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kerugma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kerygma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maturity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open microphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open mike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outsiders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[persuasion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pietistic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polemics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preacher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presuppositionalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proclamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhetoric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teacher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[types of speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uniting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historeo.com/web/?p=1754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do these people have in common? French President Nicolas Sarkozy and U.S. President Barack Obama on 8 Nov 2011. &#160; U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer on 29 Mar 2011. &#160; Civil rights activist Jesse Jackson on July 6 2008. Each (re)learned the hazards of open microphones: Sarkozy and Obama in regard to Israeli Prime Minister [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://historeo.com/web/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1754</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boasting in Baptism?</title>
		<link>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1752</link>
		<comments>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1752#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 03:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wtb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[- Legalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baptism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christian identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[common faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confessional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infant baptism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark of a christian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[objectivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[righteousness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subjectivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historeo.com/web/?p=1752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do a Google search on the phrase &#8220;is not a Christian&#8221; and two criteria will compete for first place in denying people a Christian identity. The first is . . . &#8211; not having been baptized and the second is &#8211; not having &#8220;the Spirit.&#8221; Baptism edges out the Spirit as the missing &#8220;credential&#8221; of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://historeo.com/web/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1752</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thank you Conan O&#8217;Brien</title>
		<link>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1750</link>
		<comments>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1750#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 04:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wtb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[- Sexuality/Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conan o'brien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david gorshein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ontological inferiority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scott cronick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historeo.com/web/?p=1750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good ideas are well-served by good illustrations and tonight Conan O&#8217;Brien will gift us with a great one. Conan O&#8217;Brien (left) and gay fiancés David Gorshein and Scott Cronick. O&#8217;Brien will reportedly perform Gorshein and Cronick&#8217;s wedding during tonight&#8217;s show. (Use of copyrighted material for critical commentary is fair use.) As I&#8217;ve noted before, gay [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://historeo.com/web/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1750</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Occupywallstreet: better living through political protest . . .</title>
		<link>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1748</link>
		<comments>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1748#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wtb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higher education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occupy wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occupywallstreet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historeo.com/web/?p=1748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The “occupywallstreet” protesters are furious over Wall Street’s self-enrichment via its undue influence on the political process. Photo from http://rangel.house.gov/index.shtml Capitalism has a corrupting influence on politics and must be severely restrained. Or could it be just the opposite? And maybe the protesters are really just dupes who have wound up on the losing side [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://historeo.com/web/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1748</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some thoughts for &#8220;National Coming Out Day&#8221; . . .</title>
		<link>http://historeo.com/web/?p=84</link>
		<comments>http://historeo.com/web/?p=84#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 10:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wtb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[- Sexuality/Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[- Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bisexual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bradley manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jesse dirkheiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matthew shepard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[narth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national coming out day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pedophilia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex attraction disorder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual orientation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyler clementi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historeo.com/web/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[20-plus reasons to question gay activism . . . Reason No. 1 The reality of homosexual recruitment. Reason No. 2 The invention of “sexual orientation.” Reason No. 3 Disagreements among homosexuals themselves about the nature of homosexual behavior. Reason No. 4 Unproven claims and biased research on the biology of homosexuality. Reason No. 5 Use [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://historeo.com/web/?feed=rss2&#038;p=84</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keynesian Economics</title>
		<link>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1744</link>
		<comments>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1744#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 13:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wtb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in the long run we're all dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john maynard keynes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historeo.com/web/?p=1744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Keynesian model of macroeconomics has two components worthy of reflection in the face of the current Administration&#8217;s approach to fixing the economy . . . John Maynard (&#8220;in the long run, we&#8217;re all dead&#8221;) Keynes One is the well-known tactic of stimulating a sluggish economic with infusions of government money during bad times. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://historeo.com/web/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1744</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Humans use only 10% of their brains&#8212; really?</title>
		<link>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1742</link>
		<comments>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1742#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 16:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wtb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain trauma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deepak chopra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[folk wisdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gabrielle giffords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gnosticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historeo.com/web/?p=1742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congresswoman Gabby Giffords makes a surprise return to Congress on 1 August after having suffered a gunshot wound to the head in January.Photo from Congresswoman Chellie Pingree&#8217;s website. How many times have you heard the popular bit of wisdom, &#8220;we only use 10% of our brains&#8221;? Although Gabrielle Giffords certainly wouldn&#8217;t be a compelling disproof [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://historeo.com/web/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1742</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“High Church” vs. “Low Church”</title>
		<link>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1740</link>
		<comments>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1740#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wtb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catholic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confessional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protestant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ritual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sacrament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sacramental]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historeo.com/web/?p=1740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“High church” and “low church” mean different things to different people Here are some typical distinctions . . . HIGH CHURCH _ “Catholic looking” * Institutional church IS important * Confessional view of Christian identity _ Distinction between clergy and laity _ Sacralization of time, space, objects _ Emphasis on order and ritual LOW CHURCH [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://historeo.com/web/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1740</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Personal experiences with Islam . . .</title>
		<link>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1738</link>
		<comments>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1738#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wtb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apostasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bathroom etiquette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beheading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muslim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharia law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historeo.com/web/?p=1738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Think there&#8217;s a moral equivalence between Islam and Christianity? Read the following clipping from the &#8220;Questions of Faith&#8221; column in the Saudi Gazette and ask yourself, &#8220;what would we do without Mohammed?&#8221; &#8220;What to Do in the Bathroom&#8221; Then consider, &#8220;what would we do without Jesus?&#8221; Here&#8217;s another clipping I made from a Riyadh newspaper, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://historeo.com/web/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1738</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;Akedah&#8221; as Abraham&#8217;s Dilemma?</title>
		<link>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1737</link>
		<comments>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1737#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 04:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wtb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abraham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[akedah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[binding of Isaac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canaanites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carthage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child sacrifice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dilemma ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gen 22]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genesis 22]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historical accounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moral absolutism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sacrifice of Isaac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tophet of salammbo stele]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historeo.com/web/?p=1737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Akedah&#8221; is the generic Hebrew word for &#8220;binding.&#8221; In Jewish Tradition, it came to be used as a proper noun to refer to Abraham&#8217;s &#8220;sacrifice&#8221; of Isaac (Genesis chapter 22). [God] said, &#8220;Take now your son, your only son, whom you love, Isaac, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://historeo.com/web/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1737</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Limits of Reason: an Illustration</title>
		<link>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1734</link>
		<comments>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1734#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 20:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wtb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enlightenment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foundationalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irrationalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rationalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historeo.com/web/?p=1734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A friend recently related the story of how he once pointed a T-37 Trainer straight up to see how high he could go. But he didn&#8217;t get very far and the near disaster of that experience offers an apt illustration on the limits of reason. But first, thrust-to-weight ratios are important in jets. A ratio [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://historeo.com/web/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1734</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Certainty: Three Approaches</title>
		<link>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1727</link>
		<comments>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1727#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 16:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wtb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certainty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deductive logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doubt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[empiricism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epistemic certainty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[induction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inductive logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metaphysical certainty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omniscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychological certainty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rationalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historeo.com/web/?p=1727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can doubt be a basis for certainty? Rene Descartes, famous French philosopher Painting by Frans Hals Descartes thought so. Remember his famous affirmation, &#8220;I think therefore I am.&#8221; The thoughtful Descartes was thinking about doubt. And the faint hope of certainty he seized upon was that, even if doubt could not be overcome, the existence [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://historeo.com/web/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1727</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Miss America and the problem of eating disorders</title>
		<link>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1725</link>
		<comments>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1725#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wtb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[- Sexuality/Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anorexia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battle between the sexes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulimia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eating disorders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miss america]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[western culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historeo.com/web/?p=1725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I agree with Miss America on the problem of eating disorders, I think more depth would be useful in thinking about it. The Fall of Man involves an alienation between the sexes in which each gender uses its characteristic powers to exploit the other. For example, men use physical strength and aggression while women [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://historeo.com/web/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1725</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some observations on civility</title>
		<link>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1724</link>
		<comments>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1724#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 02:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wtb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adversarial system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill ayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeremiah wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keith olbermann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morton deutsch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politial correctness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historeo.com/web/?p=1724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Obama wants us to be more polite . . . Here&#8217;s why he&#8217;s going to be disappointed&#8212; . . . and much of it is good. First the good part . . . Most of the recent interest in greater &#8220;civility&#8221; is merely a gambit for advancing political correctness under a different label. And [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://historeo.com/web/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1724</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Short Theology of God, Creation, Suffering, Free Will . . .</title>
		<link>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1723</link>
		<comments>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1723#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 14:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wtb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[godhead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suffering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trinity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historeo.com/web/?p=1723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The notion that God created the cosmos out of a sense of loneliness is mistaken. Creation arises, not out of God’s need, but out of His fullness. In Christian theology, it is the fellowship (love) between the Father and the Son that overflows into the act of Creation. Every philosophy should give an account of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://historeo.com/web/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1723</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Political Point on the Arizona Shootings</title>
		<link>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1721</link>
		<comments>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1721#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wtb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gabrielle giffords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jared loughner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historeo.com/web/?p=1721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If there are political points to be made in the Jared Loughner incident they ought to include the obvious observation that the political left is using the story to project its own malice, motives, and mentality onto its opponents. Mug shot of alleged Arizona shooter Jared Loughner(AP Photo from Pima County Sheriff&#8217;s Dept. by way [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://historeo.com/web/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1721</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms Units</title>
		<link>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1719</link>
		<comments>http://historeo.com/web/?p=1719#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 19:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wtb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[- Sexuality/Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women in combat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historeo.com/web/?p=1719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a Military.com article, the Army is studying use of women in combat units . . . Article photo, which may or may not be copyrighted. Use here in critical commentary is considered fair use. Some would say it&#8217;s due to the shortage of men who can bear arms. Not to worry though . [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://historeo.com/web/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1719</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

